Food hygiene in Newham: results and inspection dates
- Food hygiene map
- England
- Food hygiene in Newham: results and inspection dates
This is an area summary. It does not give a rating for one premises. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.
In Newham, the hygiene file accepted on 18 October 2026 holds 2,434 known ratings, and 14.0% of them need improvement. The 95 percent interval runs from 12.6% to 15.5%. Against the same business types in England the gap is 10.4 pp. Waiting and exempt records stay outside.
Wilson 14.0% (95% interval 12.6% to 15.5%), from 2,434 ratings
This is an area summary, not a rating for one premises. Improvement means a result that needs improvement; it is not improvement over time. The file date is not the date of every inspection. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.
Needs improvement means FHRS ratings at 0, 1 or 2, or an FHIS Improvement Required result. Waiting and exempt results do not enter that share.
Median age of the known rating dates: 349 days. Older than two years: 10.5% (95% interval 9.3% to 11.8%), from 2,434 ratings.
- Newham restaurants: 11.6% (95% interval 9.3% to 14.4%), from 620 ratings
- Newham takeaways: 16.8% (95% interval 13.3% to 21.0%), from 369 ratings
Choose an area or a business type
These figures describe groups. Use a current FSA record for an individual premises.
Newham restaurantsNewham takeawaysFind a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency
Figures
- Gap against the same types10.4 ppOther premises of the same business types and scheme in the same country; weighted to this area's mix. A difference has no Wilson interval. Comparison covers 2,434 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base.
- Median age of a rating349 daysDays since inspection, known rating dates only. This does not say an inspection is overdue. Based on 2,434 ratings with a known date.
- Older than two years10.5% (95% interval 9.3% to 11.8%), from 2,434 ratingsShare of dated results above two years. Missing dates stay outside this denominator.
- Waiting or unknown results161 recordsCount outside every known-rating share; waiting is not a rating of zero.
Shared scale: 0% to 15.5%.
Newham: 14.0% (95% interval 12.6% to 15.5%), from 2,434 ratings
England: 3.1% (95% interval 3.0% to 3.2%), from 442,930 ratings
Hygiene: 12.9% (95% interval 9.7% to 17.0%), from 340 ratings
Structural: 37.9% (95% interval 32.9% to 43.3%), from 340 ratings
Confidence in management: 65.9% (95% interval 60.6% to 70.8%), from 340 ratings
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Known ratings | 2,434 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Results needing improvement | 340 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Waiting or unknown results | 161 records | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Exempt premises | 78 premises | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Needs improvement | 14.0% | 12.6% | 15.5% | 2,434 ratings |
| Rated five | 49.1% | 47.1% | 51.1% | 2,434 ratings |
Further calculated measures
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gap against the same types | 10.4 pp | No interval | No interval | 2,434 ratings |
| Median age of a rating | 349 days | No interval | No interval | 2,434 ratings |
| Older than two years | 10.5% | 9.3% | 11.8% | 2,434 ratings |
| Low ratings with all three scores | 340 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Hygiene | 12.9% | 9.7% | 17.0% | 340 ratings |
| Structural | 37.9% | 32.9% | 43.3% | 340 ratings |
| Confidence in management | 65.9% | 60.6% | 70.8% | 340 ratings |
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Known ratings | 442,930 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Results needing improvement | 13,862 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Waiting or unknown results | 39,697 records | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Exempt premises | 21,620 premises | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Needs improvement | 3.1% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 442,930 ratings |
| Rated five | 78.5% | 78.3% | 78.6% | 442,930 ratings |
Further calculated measures
| Measure | Result | Low | High | Ratings counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age of a rating | 436 days | No interval | No interval | 442,930 ratings |
| Older than two years | 25.1% | 25.0% | 25.3% | 442,930 ratings |
| Low ratings with all three scores | 13,759 ratings | No interval | No interval | Exact file count |
| Hygiene | 22.6% | 21.8% | 23.3% | 13,759 ratings |
| Structural | 41.5% | 40.6% | 42.4% | 13,759 ratings |
| Confidence in management | 48.8% | 47.9% | 49.7% | 13,759 ratings |
What to do next
Part of what this page would normally show is missing from the accepted file: either the rating dates needed for an age figure, or the three component scores needed for a mix, or the second snapshot needed for a 30-day change. The figures that are present stand on their own denominators. The missing part is absent, not zero.
Open one business type in this area, or read how the figures are calculated.
Limits of these figures
Known results: 2,434 ratings; needing improvement: 340 ratings; waiting or unknown: 161 records; exempt: 78 premises. Waiting and exempt records are outside the known results.
Rating dates missing from 0 ratings. The median and age share use 2,434 ratings with known dates.
Low ratings with complete component scores: 340 ratings. Low ratings excluded because a score is missing: 0 ratings. Published ratings are not reconstructed from their components.
Unknown-result scenarios: 13.1% to 19.4% if every waiting or unknown result became known. These are scenario bounds, not confidence intervals. Exempt premises remain excluded.
Comparison covers 2,434 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base. The base uses other premises in England under the same scheme.
No 30-day change is published: two accepted files exactly 30 days apart are required. One snapshot cannot show how many premises improved or worsened.
Inspections are not a random sample. These intervals describe the known-result shares, not the chance that a particular premises is safe.
It does not tell you about one premises. A share describes the known ratings in an area on the day of the file, and a single rating can change the day after.
It does not count premises waiting for a rating, and it does not count exempt premises. Both stay outside the denominator, so a low share is not evidence that everything was inspected.
It does not say an inspection is overdue. The age of a rating is the gap since the last published inspection, and the publisher sets no deadline we could measure against.
It does not rank areas. Where two intervals overlap, the order of the two numbers carries no information.
It does not combine schemes. A Scottish pass result and a 0 to 5 score are different measurements and are never averaged.
Source
- Source
- Food Standards Agency, national English-language open data file
- File accepted
- 18 October 2026
- Publisher file timestamp
- 2026-10-17T01:06:42Z
- National file count
- 614,349
- Source SHA-256
- 0eccd1ba6db3e1cb9ec1e50c296a825d4c4a0dceec3935b2fc2e0106936b5715
- Calculation release
- fsa-2026-10-18-0eccd1ba6db3-e2b1a3747bdf
- Method
- Same-type, same-scheme profiles; unknown and exempt results excluded from shares.
- Substantive change
- 18 October 2026
Download this page’s aggregate CSV · Read this page’s calculation data · Read how the figures are calculated