Food hygiene in Sutton: results and inspection dates

Food hygiene map
England
Food hygiene in Sutton: results and inspection dates

This is an area summary. It does not give a rating for one premises. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.

In Sutton, the hygiene file accepted on 18 October 2026 holds 1,174 known ratings, and 3.6% of them need improvement. The 95 percent interval runs from 2.6% to 4.9%. Against the same business types in England the gap is 0.2 pp. Waiting and exempt records stay outside.

Wilson 3.6% (95% interval 2.6% to 4.9%), from 1,174 ratings

This is an area summary, not a rating for one premises. Improvement means a result that needs improvement; it is not improvement over time. The file date is not the date of every inspection. Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency.

Needs improvement means FHRS ratings at 0, 1 or 2, or an FHIS Improvement Required result. Waiting and exempt results do not enter that share.

Median age of the known rating dates: 347 days. Older than two years: 11.6% (95% interval 9.8% to 13.6%), from 1,174 ratings.

Sutton restaurants: 3.0% (95% interval 1.5% to 5.7%), from 299 ratings
Sutton takeaways: 5.3% (95% interval 2.8% to 9.5%), from 189 ratings

Choose an area or a business type

These figures describe groups. Use a current FSA record for an individual premises.

Sutton restaurants Sutton takeaways Find a premises rating at the Food Standards Agency

Figures

Gap against the same types0.2 ppOther premises of the same business types and scheme in the same country; weighted to this area's mix. A difference has no Wilson interval. Comparison covers 1,174 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base.
Median age of a rating347 daysDays since inspection, known rating dates only. This does not say an inspection is overdue. Based on 1,174 ratings with a known date.
Older than two years11.6% (95% interval 9.8% to 13.6%), from 1,174 ratingsShare of dated results above two years. Missing dates stay outside this denominator.
Waiting or unknown results44 recordsCount outside every known-rating share; waiting is not a rating of zero.

Share needing improvement. Dots and end marks show each group's own Wilson interval. Country totals describe their own business mix; they are not the weighted base used for the gap. Source: Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026.

Shared scale: 0% to 4.9%.

Sutton: 3.6% (95% interval 2.6% to 4.9%), from 1,174 ratings
England: 3.1% (95% interval 3.0% to 3.2%), from 442,930 ratings

Parts with the most points lost among results at 0, 1 or 2 with all three scores. Ties count in each tied part, so shares can add up to more than 100 percent. Source: Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026.

Hygiene: 52.4% (95% interval 37.7% to 66.7%), from 42 ratings
Structural: 21.4% (95% interval 11.7% to 36.0%), from 42 ratings
Confidence in management: 42.9% (95% interval 29.1% to 57.8%), from 42 ratings

Sutton — Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026
Measure	Result	Low	High	Ratings counted
Known ratings	1,174 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Results needing improvement	42 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Waiting or unknown results	44 records	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Exempt premises	111 premises	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Needs improvement	3.6%	2.6%	4.9%	1,174 ratings
Rated five	75.0%	72.4%	77.5%	1,174 ratings

Further calculated measures

Sutton — Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026
Measure	Result	Low	High	Ratings counted
Gap against the same types	0.2 pp	No interval	No interval	1,174 ratings
Median age of a rating	347 days	No interval	No interval	1,174 ratings
Older than two years	11.6%	9.8%	13.6%	1,174 ratings
Low ratings with all three scores	42 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Hygiene	52.4%	37.7%	66.7%	42 ratings
Structural	21.4%	11.7%	36.0%	42 ratings
Confidence in management	42.9%	29.1%	57.8%	42 ratings

England — Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026
Measure	Result	Low	High	Ratings counted
Known ratings	442,930 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Results needing improvement	13,862 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Waiting or unknown results	39,697 records	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Exempt premises	21,620 premises	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Needs improvement	3.1%	3.0%	3.2%	442,930 ratings
Rated five	78.5%	78.3%	78.6%	442,930 ratings

Further calculated measures

England — Food Standards Agency, file accepted 18 October 2026
Measure	Result	Low	High	Ratings counted
Median age of a rating	436 days	No interval	No interval	442,930 ratings
Older than two years	25.1%	25.0%	25.3%	442,930 ratings
Low ratings with all three scores	13,759 ratings	No interval	No interval	Exact file count
Hygiene	22.6%	21.8%	23.3%	13,759 ratings
Structural	41.5%	40.6%	42.4%	13,759 ratings
Confidence in management	48.8%	47.9%	49.7%	13,759 ratings

What to do next

Part of what this page would normally show is missing from the accepted file: either the rating dates needed for an age figure, or the three component scores needed for a mix, or the second snapshot needed for a 30-day change. The figures that are present stand on their own denominators. The missing part is absent, not zero.

Open one business type in this area, or read how the figures are calculated.

Limits of these figures

Known results: 1,174 ratings; needing improvement: 42 ratings; waiting or unknown: 44 records; exempt: 111 premises. Waiting and exempt records are outside the known results.

Rating dates missing from 0 ratings. The median and age share use 1,174 ratings with known dates.

Low ratings with complete component scores: 42 ratings. Low ratings excluded because a score is missing: 0 ratings. Published ratings are not reconstructed from their components.

Unknown-result scenarios: 3.4% to 7.1% if every waiting or unknown result became known. These are scenario bounds, not confidence intervals. Exempt premises remain excluded.

Comparison covers 1,174 ratings; excludes 0 ratings without an adequate same-type base. The base uses other premises in England under the same scheme.

No 30-day change is published: two accepted files exactly 30 days apart are required. One snapshot cannot show how many premises improved or worsened.

Inspections are not a random sample. These intervals describe the known-result shares, not the chance that a particular premises is safe.

It does not tell you about one premises. A share describes the known ratings in an area on the day of the file, and a single rating can change the day after.

It does not count premises waiting for a rating, and it does not count exempt premises. Both stay outside the denominator, so a low share is not evidence that everything was inspected.

It does not say an inspection is overdue. The age of a rating is the gap since the last published inspection, and the publisher sets no deadline we could measure against.

It does not rank areas. Where two intervals overlap, the order of the two numbers carries no information.

It does not combine schemes. A Scottish pass result and a 0 to 5 score are different measurements and are never averaged.

Source

Source: Food Standards Agency, national English-language open data file
File accepted: 18 October 2026
Publisher file timestamp: 2026-10-17T01:06:42Z
National file count: 614,349
Source SHA-256: 0eccd1ba6db3e1cb9ec1e50c296a825d4c4a0dceec3935b2fc2e0106936b5715
Calculation release: fsa-2026-10-18-0eccd1ba6db3-e2b1a3747bdf
Method: Same-type, same-scheme profiles; unknown and exempt results excluded from shares.
Substantive change: 18 October 2026

Download this page’s aggregate CSV · Read this page’s calculation data · Read how the figures are calculated